How to Remember More of What You Read

You know the feeling. You close a book, satisfied that you've followed every argument. You may even have underlined the best passages. Then somebody asks what you took from it, and the ideas are suddenly harder to find than you expected.

It is an awkward discovery: understanding something while you read it is not quite the same as remembering it later.

There is a simple way to test the difference. After finishing a section, shut the book and try to explain what it said. No peeking. Even a few sentences will tell you more about what has stayed with you than another leisurely read-through.

The research behind that advice contains a surprise.

In a 2006 experiment, psychologists Henry Roediger and Jeffrey Karpicke worked with 180 university students who were learning short prose passages. One group studied a passage in four separate sessions. Another studied it once, then spent three sessions trying to write down what they could remember. The experiment also included a third group that combined more studying with one recall test.

If you had tested the students almost immediately, you might have concluded that rereading was the better method. Five minutes later, the four-session study group recalled 83 per cent of the material, compared with 71 per cent for those who had practised remembering.

But a week changed the picture. The recall-practice group remembered about 61 per cent; the group that had spent all four sessions studying remembered about 40 per cent. And the students who had studied repeatedly had been more confident about how much they would remember.

That is what makes rereading so seductive. The words become familiar, and familiarity can feel like learning. The feeling is real. The memory may not be as strong.

The difference between knowing a page and knowing an idea

Think about the last time you returned to a paragraph you liked. On the second reading, it probably seemed clearer. You knew what came next. Nothing in it surprised you.

Now imagine explaining the same paragraph to a friend without looking at the page. Where would you begin? Which detail would you leave out? Could you say why the argument mattered?

Those questions expose a difference that is easy to overlook when the book is open. Recognition tells you that something looks familiar. Recall asks whether you can bring it back yourself.

This is also why a highlighter can be misleading. Highlighting may help you relocate a useful passage, but it doesn't, by itself, show that you've learned it. In a major 2013 review of study techniques, John Dunlosky and colleagues rated highlighting and rereading as low-utility approaches overall, while practice testing received a high-utility rating.

You needn't abandon the highlighter. Just don't ask it to do the remembering for you.

Try the Closed-Book Rule

Here is the whole method: read, close the book, recall, then check.

Start with a manageable section. When you finish, turn away from the page. Say the main idea aloud or write it down in ordinary language. There is no need to sound clever. You are trying to find out what you actually remember.

Ask yourself three things:

• What was the author's main point?
• What evidence or example supported it?
• How does it connect with something I already know?

Then open the book again. Compare your answer with the text. Perhaps you remembered the conclusion but missed the reasoning. Perhaps you recalled an example but not what it was supposed to prove. Now you have a reason to reread a particular part, rather than starting the whole chapter again.

For a practical book, there is a fourth question worth asking: What, if anything, would I do differently because I read this?

You may feel slower doing this. That is not necessarily a sign that it isn't working. Recalling something without the page in front of you requires more effort than recognising it when you see it. The point is not to make reading difficult for its own sake, but to give memory a chance to work.

Give the idea another chance to return

A good explanation today is encouraging. It does not guarantee you'll remember it next Thursday.

So come back to the idea after some time has passed. Before consulting your notes, see what you can recover. Then check the gaps.

You could try recalling the main points the next day, again later in the week and once more after a month. That is a suggested routine, not the precise schedule tested in Roediger and Karpicke's experiment; the intervals that suit you will depend on what you are learning and why.

The important change is in the order. Remember first; reread to correct yourself afterwards.

This works as a useful habit beyond books. A speaker preparing a talk could read the script several times, or could put it down and explain the argument aloud. The second approach reveals the places where the thread goes missing. It is an illustration of the principle, not a separate result from the reading experiment.

What to do with tonight's reading

You don't need a new app or an elaborate study system. Pick one chapter you genuinely want to remember. When you reach the end, shut the book. Give yourself a minute to recover its central thought. Check what you missed, and make a note to try again in a few days.

Do it because the idea matters to you, not because every page must become a lesson. Some books are worth reading simply for the pleasure of being in them.

But when you want a book to change what you know, how you think or what you do, the most useful moment may come just after you close it.

ALTIUS Note

The 61 and 40 per cent results come from one laboratory experiment involving 180 university students learning short passages. The researchers measured the proportion of ideas recalled, not how much of a whole book participants remembered. The practice tests in that experiment did not provide corrective feedback, whereas the Closed-Book Rule above recommends checking mistakes afterwards. The wider evidence for retrieval practice is substantial, but its benefit varies with the material, the learner and the way the practice is organised. No personal coaching case has been added because none was supplied or verified.

Research References

• Roediger, H. L. & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x
• Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J. & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students' learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266

Related from ALTIUS

• Learning That Feels Easy Can Be Misleading
• Attention Is Not a Character Test
• We Have Not Forgotten How to Think

Keep reading ALTIUS

Subscribe for new essays and analysis, or sign in if you already have an account.

Subscribe · Sign in